Mental health courts: a workable proposition?
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Mental health courts.
PURPOSE OF REVIEW To describe the aims and objectives of mental health courts. To give an overview of the current literature devoted to mental health courts. To suggest where we might go in the future. RECENT FINDINGS While not flawless, mental health courts represent an innovative approach to addressing the needs of individuals within our society who have historically been alienated by both ...
متن کاملTheorizing Mental Health Courts
To date, no scholarly article has analyzed the theoretical basis of mental health courts, which currently exist in forty-three states. This Article examines the two utilitarian justifications proposed by mental health court advocates—therapeutic jurisprudence and therapeutic rehabilitation—and finds both insufficient. Therapeutic jurisprudence is inadequate to justify mental health courts becau...
متن کاملMental health courts – a human rights perspective
This presentation analyzes specialised mental health courts (MHCs), as one solution to the long-standing, growing challenge of dealing fairly and justly with persons with mental illness (PMIs) coming before the criminal justice system, from a human rights (HR) perspective. MHCs have garnered professional and political support in North America. Redefining their primary purpose from the determina...
متن کاملMental health courts: no longer experimental.
Mental health courts (MHCs) are problem-solving courts that, via a separate docket, divert mentally ill offenders away from jail and into long-term community mental health treatment. By combining a “problem-solving orientation,” the use of therapeutic jurisprudence, and a redefinition of adversarialism, MHCs seek to reduce recidivism. Though in existence for less than a decade, MHCs are not exp...
متن کاملMental health courts: process and outcomes
Mental health courts are the most recent development in therapeutic courts [1]. While mental health courts vary in their characteristics, they rest on the assumption that creating access to treatment for defendants is an important strategy in reducing recidivism. Mental health courts differ from traditional criminal courts in a number of important ways. The most significant is that the judge an...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Psychiatric Bulletin
سال: 2001
ISSN: 0955-6036,1472-1473
DOI: 10.1192/pb.25.1.5